Comment on "Longitudinal wobbling in $^{133}$La [Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 159 (2019)]"
W. Hua, S. Guo, C. M. Petrache

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a previous claim of longitudinal wobbling in 133La, highlighting issues with experimental evidence that question the validity of the original wobbling band assignment.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of prior experimental data, challenging the established identification of the wobbling band in 133La.
Findings
Problems with reported experimental data
Questioning of the wobbling band assignment
Need for more robust evidence
Abstract
In [S. Biswas et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 159 (2019)] a longitudinal wobbling band was reported in La. The critical experimental proof for this assignment is the E2 dominated linking transitions between the wobbling and normal bands, which are supported by angular distribution and linear polarization measurements. However, severe problems are found in the reported experimental information, indicating that the assignment of wobbling band was not firmly established.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
