Risk assessment for airborne disease transmission by poly-pathogen aerosols
Freja Nordsiek, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Gholamhossein Bagheri

TL;DR
This paper extends the Wells-Riley model to account for poly-pathogen aerosols, providing a more accurate risk assessment for airborne disease transmission, especially at high pathogen concentrations and in poorly ventilated environments.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized model that separately considers multiple pathogen copies per aerosol, improving upon the traditional mono-pathogen assumption.
Findings
Mono-pathogen assumption overestimates infection risk at high pathogen loads.
The model accounts for aerosol filtering and facemask effects.
Risk assessment accuracy improves in high-density, poorly ventilated settings.
Abstract
In the case of airborne diseases, pathogen copies are transmitted by droplets of respiratory tract fluid that are exhaled by the infectious and, after partial or full drying, inhaled as aerosols by the susceptible. The risk of infection in indoor environments is typically modelled using the Wells-Riley model or a Wells-Riley-like formulation, usually assuming the pathogen dose follows a Poisson distribution (mono-pathogen assumption). Aerosols that hold more than one pathogen copy, i.e. poly-pathogen aerosols, break this assumption even if the aerosol dose itself follows a Poisson distribution. For the largest aerosols where the number of pathogen in each aerosol can sometimes be several hundred or several thousand, the effect is non-negligible, especially in diseases where the risk of infection per pathogen is high. Here we report on a generalization of the Wells-Riley model and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
