Medium-band observation of the neutrino emitting blazar, TXS 0506+056
Sungyong Hwang, Myungshin Im, Yoon Chan Taak, Insu Paek, Changsu Choi,, Suhyun Shin, Sang-Yun Lee, Tae-Geun Ji, Soojong Pak, Hye-In Lee, Hojae Ahn,, Jimin Han, Changgon Kim, Jennifer Marshall, Christopher M. Johns-Krull, Coyne, A. Gibson, Luke Schmidt, Travis Prochaska

TL;DR
This study uses medium-band optical observations to analyze the spectral properties and variability of the neutrino-emitting blazar TXS 0506+056, constraining its classification and emission mechanisms.
Contribution
First medium-band optical observations of TXS 0506+056 provide detailed spectral analysis and variability constraints, improving understanding of its blazar nature and emission characteristics.
Findings
Peak synchrotron frequency at 10^14.28 Hz
TXS 0506+056 is consistent with the blazar sequence
No significant spectral variability detected during observation
Abstract
TXS 0506+056 is a blazar that has been recently identified as the counterpart of the neutrino event IceCube-170922A. Understanding blazar type of TXS 0506+056 is important to constrain the neutrino emission mechanism, but the blazar nature of TXS 0506+056 is still uncertain. As an attempt to understand the nature of TXS 0506+056, we report the medium-band observation results of TXS 0506+056, covering the wavelength range of 0.575 to 1.025 m. The use of the medium-band filters allow us to examine if there were any significant changes in its spectral shapes over the course of one month and give a better constraint on the peak frequency of synchrotron radiation with quasi-simultaneous datasets. The peak frequency is found to be Hz, and our analysis shows that TXS 0506+056 is not an outlier from the blazar sequence. As a way to determine the blazar type, we also analyzed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
