Fundamental physics with Espresso: Towards an accurate wavelength calibration for a precision test of the fine-structure constant
Tobias M. Schmidt, Paolo Molaro, Michael T. Murphy, Christophe Lovis,, Guido Cupani, Stefano Cristiani, Francesco A. Pepe, Rafael Rebolo, Nuno C., Santos, Manuel Abreu, Vardan Adibekyan, Yann Alibert, Matteo Aliverti, Romain, Allart, Carlos Allende Prieto, David Alves

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the wavelength calibration accuracy of the Espresso spectrograph, comparing it to laser frequency comb calibration, and demonstrates its potential for precise measurements of the fine-structure constant variation.
Contribution
It provides a detailed assessment of Espresso's wavelength calibration systematics and compares its default solution to an independent laser frequency comb calibration.
Findings
Wavelength discrepancies up to 24 m/s were found.
Espresso's calibration accuracy exceeds previous spectrographs.
Constraints on fine-structure constant variation at 10^{-6} level are feasible.
Abstract
Observations of metal absorption systems in the spectra of distant quasars allow to constrain a possible variation of the fine-structure constant throughout the history of the Universe. Such a test poses utmost demands on the wavelength accuracy and previous studies were limited by systematics in the spectrograph wavelength calibration. A substantial advance in the field is therefore expected from the new ultra-stable high-resolution spectrograph Espresso, recently installed at the VLT. In preparation of the fundamental physics related part of the Espresso GTO program, we present a thorough assessment of the Espresso wavelength accuracy and identify possible systematics at each of the different steps involved in the wavelength calibration process. Most importantly, we compare the default wavelength solution, based on the combination of Thorium-Argon arc lamp spectra and a Fabry-P\'erot…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
