Coends of higher arity

TL;DR

This paper introduces higher arity coends and ends in category theory, exploring their role in weighted and diagonal variants of categorical concepts, enabling new theoretical frameworks.

Contribution

It formalizes higher arity coends and ends, and applies them to develop weighted and diagonal category theories, expanding the scope of categorical constructions.

Findings

Defined $(p,q)$-ends and coends for higher arity cases.

Developed weighted variants of classical categorical notions.

Introduced diagonal category theory with new universality concepts.

Abstract

We specialise a recently introduced notion of generalised dinaturality for functors $T : (\mathcal{C}^\text{op})^p \times \mathcal{C}^q \to \mathcal{D}$ to the case where the domain (resp., codomain) is constant, obtaining notions of ends (resp., coends) of higher arity, dubbed herein $(p,q)$-ends (resp., $(p,q)$-coends). While higher arity co/ends are particular instances of "totally symmetrised" (ordinary) co/ends, they serve an important technical role in the study of a number of new categorical phenomena, which may be broadly classified as two new variants of category theory. The first of these, weighted category theory, consists of the study of weighted variants of the classical notions and construction found in ordinary category theory, besides that of a limit. This leads to a host of varied and rich notions, such as weighted Kan extensions, weighted adjunctions, and weighted ends. The second, diagonal category theory, proceeds in a different (albeit related) direction, in which one replaces universality with respect to natural transformations with universality with respect to dinatural transformations, mimicking the passage from limits to ends. In doing so, one again encounters a number of new interesting notions, among which one similarly finds diagonal Kan extensions, diagonal adjunctions, and diagonal ends.