Are the Moon's nearside-farside asymmetries the result of a giant impact?
Meng-Hua Zhu, Kai Wunnemann, Ross W. K. Potter, Thorsten Kleine,, Alessandro Morbidelli

TL;DR
This study uses numerical modeling to test if a giant impact on the early Moon can explain its nearside-farside asymmetries in elevation, crustal composition, and structure, supporting the impact hypothesis for lunar formation.
Contribution
The paper provides quantitative modeling evidence that a giant impact can produce the observed lunar asymmetries and crustal features, linking impact processes to lunar geology.
Findings
A large impactor can create a mega-basin and crustal asymmetries.
Impact excavates and redistributes KREEP material across the lunar surface.
Pre-impact lunar W isotope anomalies may have existed, supporting a giant impact origin.
Abstract
The Moon exhibits striking geological asymmetries in elevation, crustal thickness, and composition between its nearside and farside. Although several scenarios have been proposed to explain these asymmetries, their origin remains debated. Recent remote sensing observations suggest that (1) the crust on the farside highlands consists of two layers: a primary anorthositic layer with thickness of ~30-50 km and on top a more mafic-rich layer ~10 km thick; and (2) the nearside exhibits a large area of low-Ca pyroxene that has been interpreted to have an impact origin. These observations support the idea that the lunar nearside-farside asymmetries may be the result of a giant impact. Here, using quantitative numerical modeling, we test the hypothesis that a giant impact on the early Moon can explain the striking differences in elevation, crustal thickness, and composition between the nearside…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
