Revealing configurational attractors in the evolution of modern Australian and US cities
Bohdan Slavko, Kirill Glavatskiy, Mikhail Prokopenko

TL;DR
This paper investigates the spatial patterns of modern cities, revealing that larger cities tend to be more heterogeneous and compact, and introduces a model explaining the emergence of these configurations and their stability.
Contribution
It introduces a model consistent with migration data that predicts urban configurations and identifies distinct phases and attractors in city spatial structures.
Findings
Larger cities cluster with low spreading and high heterogeneity.
Urban configurations fall into three phases: uniform, monocentric, polycentric.
Configurable attractors form a narrow region in heterogeneity-spreading space.
Abstract
The spatial structure of modern cities exhibits highly diverse patterns and keeps evolving under numerous constraints. Two key dimensions have recently achieved prominence in characterizing this diversity: heterogeneity and spreading. However, modern settlements do not fill the entire heterogeneity--spreading space. Yet, the dynamic mechanisms leading to emergence of the observed layouts are unclear. Here, we assess the heterogeneity and spreading of population density in 25 Australian and 175 US cities. We observe that larger cities tend to form a cluster with a low degree of spreading and a high degree of heterogeneity, and relate this observation to the dynamic properties of intra-urban migration in these cities. In doing so, we introduce a model consistent with the relocation data which predicts such highly compact and heterogeneous structure for the majority of cities, in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
