WASP-107b's density is even lower: a case study for the physics of planetary gas envelope accretion and orbital migration
Caroline Piaulet, Bj\"orn Benneke, Ryan A. Rubenzahl, Andrew W., Howard, Eve J. Lee, Daniel Thorngren, Ruth Angus, Merrin Peterson, Joshua E., Schlieder, Michael Werner, Laura Kreidberg, Tareq Jaouni, Ian J. M., Crossfield, David R. Ciardi, Erik A. Petigura, John Livingston

TL;DR
This study reveals that WASP-107b has an extraordinarily low density due to a massive gas envelope, challenging traditional planet formation theories and highlighting the importance of accretion physics and orbital migration.
Contribution
The paper provides detailed RV measurements and modeling that demonstrate a low-mass core with a large gas envelope, offering new insights into gas accretion and migration processes for Neptune-like planets.
Findings
WASP-107b's mass is only 1.8 Neptune masses.
WASP-107b has a gas envelope mass fraction >85%.
A second massive planet influences the system's dynamics.
Abstract
With a mass in the Neptune regime and a radius of Jupiter, WASP-107b presents a challenge to planet formation theories. Meanwhile, the planet's low surface gravity and the star's brightness also make it one of the most favorable targets for atmospheric characterization. Here, we present the results of an extensive 4-year Keck/HIRES radial-velocity (RV) follow-up program of the WASP-107 system and provide a detailed study of the physics governing the accretion of its gas envelope. We reveal that WASP-107b's mass is only 1.8 Neptune masses ( ). The resulting extraordinarily low density suggests that WASP-107b has a H/He envelope mass fraction of % unless it is substantially inflated. The corresponding core mass of at 3 is significantly lower than what is traditionally assumed to be necessary to trigger massive gas envelope…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
