No Stagnation Region Before the Heliopause at Voyager 1? Inferences From New Voyager 2 Results
A. C. Cummings, E. C. Stone, J. D. Richardson, B. C. Heikkila, N. Lal,, J. K\'ota

TL;DR
This study analyzes anisotropy in cosmic-ray protons from Voyager 2 data to infer solar wind speeds, revealing discrepancies with direct measurements and implications for understanding the heliopause region.
Contribution
Introduces a new technique to derive the radial component of anisotropy from CRS data and compares it with existing measurements to study heliosheath dynamics.
Findings
CRS-derived radial speeds generally agree with Low-Energy Charged Particle data.
Significant differences exist between C-G derived speeds and PLS measurements.
C-G method may underestimate true speeds near the heliopause.
Abstract
We present anisotropy results for anomalous cosmic-ray (ACR) protons in the energy range 0.5-35 MeV from Cosmic Ray Subsytem (CRS) data collected during calibration roll maneuvers for the magnetometer instrument when Voyager 2 (V2) was in the inner heliosheath. We use a new technique to derive for the first time the radial component of the anisotropy vector from CRS data. We find that the CRS-derived radial solar wind speeds, when converted from the radial components of the anisotropy vectors via the Compton-Getting (C-G) effect, generally agree with those similarly-derived speeds from the Low-Energy Charged Particle experiment using 28-43 keV data. However, they often differ significantly from the radial solar wind speeds measured directly by the Plasma Science (PLS) instrument. There are both periods when the C-G-derived radial solar wind speeds are significantly higher than…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
