Evaluation of quality measures for color quantization
Giuliana Ramella

TL;DR
This paper evaluates nine image quality assessment measures specifically for color quantization, highlighting their performance and correlation with human ratings across different databases, aiding in selecting suitable measures.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of quality measures for color quantization, addressing a gap in existing image quality assessment research.
Findings
Certain quality measures show higher correlation with human ratings.
Database selection significantly influences evaluation results.
Performance trends are consistent across different databases.
Abstract
Visual quality evaluation is one of the challenging basic problems in image processing. It also plays a central role in the shaping, implementation, optimization, and testing of many methods. The existing image quality assessment methods focused on images corrupted by common degradation types while little attention was paid to color quantization. This in spite there is a wide range of applications requiring color quantization assessment being used as a preprocessing step when color-based tasks are more efficiently accomplished on a reduced number of colors. In this paper, we propose and carry-out a quantitative performance evaluation of nine well-known and commonly used full-reference image quality assessment measures. The evaluation is done by using two publicly available and subjectively rated image quality databases for color quantization degradation and by considering suitable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
