Too big, too small or just right? A benchmark assessment of density functional theory for predicting the spatial extent of the electron density of small chemical systems
Diptarka Hait, Yu Hsuan Liang, Martin Head-Gordon

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of various density functional theory (DFT) methods in predicting the spatial extent of electron density in small molecules using a novel, invariant measure called the second cumulant matrix, across a benchmark dataset.
Contribution
It introduces a new benchmark dataset for the second cumulant matrix of electron densities and assesses the performance of 47 DFT functionals against it, highlighting strengths and weaknesses.
Findings
Double hybrids, SCAN, and SCAN0 perform reliably.
Modern empirical functionals show variable accuracy.
H and Be atoms are particularly challenging for DFT methods.
Abstract
Multipole moments are the first order responses of the energy to spatial derivatives of the electric field strength. The quality of density functional theory (DFT) prediction of molecular multipole moments thus characterizes errors in modeling the electron density itself, as well as the performance in describing molecules interacting with external electric fields. However, only the lowest non-zero moment is translationally invariant, making the higher order moments origin-dependent. Therefore, instead of using the quadrupole moment matrix, we utilize the translationally invariant matrix of second cumulants (or spatial variances) of the electron density as the quantity of interest (denoted by ). The principal components of are the square of the spatial extent of the electron density along each axis. A benchmark dataset of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
