FRB131104 Swift BAT data revisited: No evidence of a gamma-ray counterpart
T. Sakamoto, E. Troja, A. Lien, B. Zhang, S. B. Cenko, V. Cunningham,, E. Berger

TL;DR
A re-analysis of Swift BAT data around FRB 131104 finds no significant gamma-ray emission, setting upper limits and challenging previous claims of a high-energy counterpart, supporting the idea that most FRBs are not linked to catastrophic gamma-ray events.
Contribution
This study provides the first comprehensive re-analysis of BAT data for FRB 131104, establishing upper limits that refute earlier claims of a gamma-ray counterpart.
Findings
No significant gamma-ray emission detected
Set upper limits on fluence in 15-150 keV range
Supports non-association of FRB with gamma-ray bursts
Abstract
We present a re-analysis of the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) data around the radio detection of FRB 131104. Possible evidence of a gamma-ray counterpart was presented by DeLaunay et al. However, based on our analysis using all the available BAT data, no significant emission is found in either the temporal or the image domain. We place a 5~sigma fluence upper limit of 3.3 10 erg cm and 2.7 10 erg cm (15-150 keV) with an integration time of 300 s assuming a simple power-law spectrum with photon index of -1.2 and -2.0, respectively. Our result does not support the association of this FRB with a high-energy counterpart, in agreement with growing observational evidence that most FRBs are not associated to catastrophic events such as gamma-ray bursts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
