The orbital evolution of UFDs and GCs in an evolving Galactic potential
Benjamin M. Armstrong, Kenji Bekki, and Aaron D. Ludlow

TL;DR
This study uses Gaia data to analyze the orbital dynamics of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies and globular clusters in the Milky Way, highlighting the effects of a dynamic Galactic potential and identifying potential first-infall objects.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison between static and evolving Galactic potential models and provides a catalog of orbital parameters for UFDs and GCs under different Galaxy mass assumptions.
Findings
Evolving potential causes small but notable orbital differences.
Boötes II likely on its first passage around the Milky Way.
Metal-rich GCs tend to have prograde, low-eccentricity orbits, while metal-poor GCs have diverse, higher-eccentricity orbits.
Abstract
We use the second Gaia data release to investigate the kinematics of 17 ultra-faint dwarf galaxies (UFDs) and 154 globular clusters (GCs) in the Milky Way, focusing on the differences between static and evolving models of the Galactic potential. An evolving potential modifies a satellite's orbit relative to its static equivalent, though the difference is small compared to existing uncertainties on orbital parameters. We find that the UFD Bo\"otes II is likely on its first passage around the Milky Way. Depending on the assumed mass of the Milky Way, the UFDs Triangulum II, Hydrus I, Coma Berenices, Draco II, and Ursa Major II, as well as the GC Pyxis, may also be on first infall so may be useful for constraining the mass of the Galaxy. We identify a clear kinematic distinction between metal-rich () and metal-poor GCs (). Although most metal-rich…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
