Revealing the Accretion Physics of Supermassive Black Holes at Redshift z~7 with Chandra and Infrared Observations
Feige Wang, Xiaohui Fan, Jinyi Yang, Chiara Mazzucchelli, Xue-Bing Wu,, Jiang-Tao Li, Eduardo Banados, Emanuele Paolo Farina, Riccardo Nanni, Yanli, Ai, Fuyan Bian, Frederick B. Davies, Roberto Decarli, Joseph F. Hennawi,, Jan-Torge Schindler, Bram Venemans, Fabian Walter

TL;DR
This study analyzes X-ray and infrared data of quasars at redshift ~7 to understand early supermassive black hole accretion physics, finding that their properties resemble lower-redshift quasars, with some differences in growth rates and X-ray spectra.
Contribution
First systematic analysis of X-ray and infrared properties of z>6.5 quasars, revealing consistent accretion physics across cosmic time and identifying differences in growth rates.
Findings
X-ray bolometric correction decreases with increasing luminosity.
$ m extit{ extbf{α}}_{ox}$ correlates with UV luminosity and Eddington ratio.
Average X-ray photon index is steeper than in low-redshift quasars.
Abstract
X-ray emission from quasars has been detected up to redshift , although only limited to a few objects at . In this work, we present new Chandra observations of five quasars. By combining with archival Chandra observations of six additional quasars, we perform a systematic analysis on the X-ray properties of these earliest accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs). We measure the black hole masses, bolometric luminosities (), Eddington ratios (), emission line properties, and infrared luminosities () of these quasars using infrared and sub-millimeter observations. Correlation analysis indicates that the X-ray bolometric correction (the factor that converts from X-ray luminosity to bolometric luminosity) decreases with increasing , and that the UV/optical-to-X-ray ratio, , strongly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
