Intervention fatigue is the primary cause of strong secondary waves in the COVID-19 pandemic
Kristoffer Rypdal, Filippo Maria Bianchi, Martin Rypdal

TL;DR
This paper models COVID-19 secondary waves by extending the SIR model to include social response and fatigue, revealing that intervention fatigue was the main driver of the fall 2020 second wave in Europe.
Contribution
It introduces a novel extension of the SIR model incorporating social response and fatigue parameters, providing insights into the dynamics of COVID-19 waves.
Findings
Intervention fatigue significantly contributed to the second wave.
The extended model accurately reproduces observed epidemic patterns.
Parameter estimation highlights the role of social response dynamics.
Abstract
As of November 2020, the number of COVID-19 cases is increasing rapidly in many countries. In Europe, the virus spread slowed considerably in the late spring due to strict lockdown, but a second wave of the pandemic grew throughout the fall. In this study, we first reconstruct the time evolution of the effective reproduction numbers for each country by integrating the equations of the classic SIR model. We cluster countries based on the estimated through a suitable time series dissimilarity. The result suggests that simple dynamical mechanisms determine how countries respond to changes in COVID-19 case counts. Inspired by these results, we extend the SIR model to include a social response to explain the number of new confirmed daily cases. As a first-order model, we assume that the social response is on the form , where …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
