Cavity optomechanics assisted by optical coherent feedback
Alfred Harwood, Matteo Brunelli, Alessio Serafini

TL;DR
This paper investigates how optical coherent feedback loops can enhance optomechanical system operations like cooling, squeezing, entanglement, and state transfer, revealing benefits and limitations of passive and active feedback.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of passive and active optical feedback effects on various optomechanical tasks, highlighting improvements and constraints.
Findings
Passive feedback improves cooling efficiency and speed.
Passive feedback stabilizes systems for entanglement generation.
Passive feedback aids transient state transfer in strong coupling.
Abstract
We consider a wide family of optical coherent feedback loops acting on an optomechanical system operating in the linearized regime. We assess the efficacy of such loops in improving key operations, such as cooling, steady-state squeezing and entanglement, as well as optical to mechanical state transfer. We find that mechanical sideband cooling can be enhanced through passive, interferometric coherent feedback, achieving lower steady-state occupancies and considerably speeding up the cooling process; we also quantify the detrimental effect of non-zero delay times on the cooling performance. Steady state entanglement generation in the blue sideband can also be assisted by passive interferometric feedback, which allows one to stabilise otherwise unstable systems, though active feedback (including squeezing elements) does not help to this aim. We show that active feedback loops only allow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
