Development of Rubrics for Capstone Project Courses: Perspectives from Teachers and Students
Rex P. Bringula

TL;DR
This paper presents the development and validation of new rubrics for capstone project assessments, incorporating feedback from faculty and students to enhance fairness and relevance.
Contribution
It introduces new rating instruments based on rubrics, validated through stakeholder input, to improve assessment fairness in capstone courses.
Findings
Faculty and students found new rubrics fairer than previous ones
Final instruments are ready for deployment in the upcoming semester
Future research directions are outlined
Abstract
This study attempted to develop fair, relevant, and content-valid assessment tools for capstone project courses. Toward this goal, new rating instruments based on the concept of rubrics were proposed. To ensure that the new instruments were valid and fair, several meetings with faculty and students of the computing science departments (i.e., Computer Science and Information Technology) were successively conducted. Eight faculty members and 10 students participated in the study. The final versions of the instruments were completed after a series of careful deliberations with faculty and students. Faculty and students perceived the new instruments fairer than the previous ones. Since the final instruments will be deployed this semester, their strengths and weaknesses are not yet known at this time. Directions for future research are presented.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEngineering Education and Curriculum Development · Diverse Education and Engineering Focus · Experimental Learning in Engineering
