Hyperbolic Distance versus Quasihyperbolic Distance in Plane Domains
David A Herron, Jeff Lindquist

TL;DR
This paper compares hyperbolic and quasihyperbolic distances in plane domains, establishing conditions for their metric space equivalences and exploring boundary relationships, with new insights into their geometric and boundary properties.
Contribution
It proves the equivalence conditions between hyperbolic and quasihyperbolic metrics and analyzes boundary correspondences in hyperbolic domains, providing new theoretical results.
Findings
Hyperbolic and quasihyperbolic metric spaces are quasisymmetrically equivalent iff they are bi-Lipschitz equivalent.
Gromov boundaries of hyperbolic domains are always quasisymmetrically equivalent.
Finitely connected hyperbolic domains have quasiisometrically equivalent hyperbolic and quasihyperbolic spaces, with exceptions demonstrated.
Abstract
We examine Euclidean plane domains with their hyperbolic or quasihyperbolic distance. We prove that the associated metric spaces are quasisymmetrically equivalent if and only if they are bi-Lipschitz equivalent. On the other hand, for Gromov hyperbolic domains, the two corresponding Gromov boundaries are always quasisymmetrically equivalent. Surprisingly, for any finitely connected hyperbolic domain, these two metric spaces are always quasiisometrically equivalent. We construct an example where the spaces are not quasiisometrically equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
