Refined Telluric Absorption Correction for Low-Resolution Ground-Based Spectroscopy: Resolution and Radial Velocity Effects in the O2 A-Band for Exoplanets and K I Emission Lines
Stefan Kimeswenger, Manuel Rainer, Norbert Przybilla, Wolfgang, Kausch

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of standard telluric correction methods at low spectral resolution, especially for the O2 A-band, and proposes a refined correction approach accounting for resolution and radial velocity effects.
Contribution
It introduces a new method for deriving correction functions using high-resolution atmospheric modeling to improve telluric correction at low spectral resolutions.
Findings
Standard correction fails at R<10000, causing flux errors over 50%.
Correction functions depend on radial velocity, resolution, and line profile.
Application to Earth analogs and K I lines demonstrates improved accuracy.
Abstract
Telluric correction of spectroscopic observations is either performed via standard stars that are observed close in time and airmass along with the science target, or recently growing in importance, by theoretical telluric absorption modeling. Both approaches work fine when the telluric lines are resolved, i.e. at spectral resolving power larger than about 10000, and it is sufficient to facilitate the detection of spectral features at lower resolution. However, a meaningful quantitative analysis requires also a reliable recovery of line strengths. Here, we show for the Fraunhofer A-band of molecular O2 that the standard telluric correction approach fails in this at lower spectral resolutions, as an example for the general problem. Doppler-shift dependent errors of the restored flux may arise, which can amount to more than 50% in extreme cases, depending on the line shapes of the target…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
