
TL;DR
This paper links ambiguity in B"uchi automata for finite and infinite words using measure theory, showing unambiguity corresponds to measure-zero sets of infinite sequences, with measures derived from weighted automata.
Contribution
It establishes a measure-theoretic characterization of ambiguity in B"uchi automata, connecting finite and infinite word ambiguity through measure-zero sets.
Findings
Unambiguous automata have measure-zero sets of ambiguous infinite sequences.
The measure used can be derived from weighted automata compatible with the B"uchi automaton.
The measure-theoretic approach provides a natural framework for analyzing ambiguity.
Abstract
In this paper, we establish a strong link between the ambiguity for finite words of a B\"uchi automaton and the ambiguity for infinite words of the same automaton. This link is based on measure theory. More precisely, we show that such an automaton is unambiguous, in the sense that no finite word labels two runs with the same starting state and the same ending state if and only if for each state, the set of infinite sequences labelling two runs starting from that state has measure zero. The measure used to define these negligible sets, that is sets of measure zero, can be any measure computed by a weighted automaton which is compatible with the B\"uchi automaton. This latter condition is very natural: the measure must put weight on cylinders [w] where w is the label of some run in the B\"uchi automaton.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
