Comparison between the Thomas-Fermi and Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov Methods in the Inner Crust of a Neutron Star: The Role of Pairing Correlations
Matthew Shelley, Alessandro Pastore

TL;DR
This paper compares the Thomas-Fermi and Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov methods to understand pairing correlations in the neutron star's inner crust, demonstrating their relative accuracy and implications for nuclear matter modeling.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison framework between the Thomas-Fermi and Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov methods, highlighting the role of pairing correlations in neutron star crusts.
Findings
Discrepancies are minimal outside very low-density regions.
Standard mean-field methods are sufficiently accurate for most of the crust.
Pairing correlations significantly influence the crust's chemical composition.
Abstract
We investigated the role of a pairing correlation in the chemical composition of the inner crust of a neutron star with the extended Thomas-Fermi method, using the Strutinsky integral correction. We compare our results with the fully self-consistent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach, showing that the resulting discrepancy, apart from the very low density region, is compatible with the typical accuracy we can achieve with standard mean-field methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
