Evolution of the Exoplanet Size Distribution: Forming Large Super-Earths Over Billions of Years
Trevor J. David, Gabriella Contardo, Angeli Sandoval, Ruth Angus, Yuxi, (Lucy) Lu, Megan Bedell, Jason L. Curtis, Daniel Foreman-Mackey, Benjamin J., Fulton, Samuel K. Grunblatt, Erik A. Petigura

TL;DR
This study investigates how the size distribution of close-in exoplanets, especially the radius valley, evolves over billions of years, revealing that atmospheric loss influences planetary sizes and compositions over time.
Contribution
It provides new evidence that the radius valley shifts to smaller sizes in younger systems, indicating a time-dependent atmospheric loss process affecting planet evolution.
Findings
Radius valley shifts to smaller radii in younger systems.
Planets unrepresented at young ages are likely rocky.
Size distribution evolves over gigayears, affecting planetary composition.
Abstract
The radius valley, a bifurcation in the size distribution of small, close-in exoplanets, is hypothesized to be a signature of planetary atmospheric loss. Such an evolutionary phenomenon should depend on the age of the star-planet system. In this work, we study the temporal evolution of the radius valley using two independent determinations of host star ages among the California-Kepler Survey (CKS) sample. We find evidence for a wide and nearly empty void of planets in the period-radius diagram at the youngest system ages (2-3 Gyr) represented in the CKS sample. We show that the orbital period dependence of the radius valley among the younger CKS planets is consistent with that found among those planets with asteroseismically determined host star radii. Relative to previous studies of preferentially older planets, the radius valley determined among the younger planetary sample…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
