
TL;DR
This paper surveys existing algorithmic approaches to redistricting, discussing challenges and promising methods, aiming to improve the fairness and effectiveness of district drawing through computational techniques.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of current algorithmic redistricting methods, highlighting what works, what doesn't, and potential future directions.
Findings
Identifies key challenges in algorithmic redistricting
Highlights promising approaches for fair districting
Provides a comprehensive survey of existing methods
Abstract
Why not have a computer just draw a map? This is something you hear a lot when people talk about gerrymandering, and it's easy to think at first that this could solve redistricting altogether. But there are more than a couple problems with this idea. In this chapter, two computer scientists survey what's been done in algorithmic redistricting, discuss what doesn't work and highlight approaches that show promise. This preprint was prepared as a chapter in the forthcoming edited volume Political Geometry, an interdisciplinary collection of essays on redistricting. (https://mggg.org/gerrybook)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
