OB associations and their origins
Nicholas J. Wright (Keele University)

TL;DR
OB associations are more complex and structured than previously thought, with new data revealing their detailed stellar content and challenging old ideas about their origins and evolution.
Contribution
This paper reviews recent observational advances that significantly revise the understanding of OB associations' structure, dynamics, and formation history.
Findings
OB associations have more substructure than previously believed.
New data from Gaia and other surveys have expanded knowledge of their stellar populations.
Theories of their origins are being fundamentally revised.
Abstract
OB associations are unbound groups of young stars made prominent by their bright OB members, and have long been thought to be the expanded remnants of dense star clusters. They have been important in astrophysics for over a century thanks to their luminous massive stars, though their low-mass members have not been well studied until the last couple of decades. This has changed thanks to data from X-ray observations, spectroscopic surveys and astrometry from Gaia that allows their full stellar content to be identified and their dynamics to be studied, which in turn is leading to changes in our understanding of these systems and their origins, with the old picture of Blaauw (1964) now being superseded. It is clear now that OB associations have considerably more substructure than once envisioned, both spatially, kinematically and temporally. These changes have implications for the star…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
