Voxelwise principal component analysis of dynamic [S-methyl-11C]methionine PET data in glioma patients
Corentin Martens, Olivier Debeir, Christine Decaestecker, Thierry, Metens, Laetitia Lebrun, Gil Leurquin-Sterk, Nicola Trotta, Serge Goldman and, Gaetan Van Simaeys

TL;DR
This study applies voxelwise principal component analysis to dynamic [S-methyl-11C]methionine PET data in glioma patients, revealing intra-tumour heterogeneity more effectively than traditional pharmacokinetic models, with potential clinical applications.
Contribution
It introduces a robust PCA-based method for analyzing high-dimensional dynamic PET data, outperforming PK models in identifying tumour heterogeneity and reducing computational costs.
Findings
PCA-derived maps better identify intra-tumour heterogeneity.
Method is robust to noise in numerical simulations.
Outperforms standard PK models in clinical data analysis.
Abstract
Recent works have demonstrated the added value of dynamic amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) for glioma grading and genotyping, biopsy targeting, and recurrence diagnosis. However, most of these studies are exclusively based on hand-crafted qualitative or semi-quantitative dynamic features extracted from the mean time activity curve (TAC) within predefined volumes. Voxelwise dynamic PET data analysis could instead provide a better insight into intra-tumour heterogeneity of gliomas. In this work, we investigate the ability of the widely used principal component analysis (PCA) method to extract meaningful quantitative dynamic features from high-dimensional motion-corrected dynamic [S-methyl-11C]methionine PET data in a first cohort of 20 glioma patients. By means of realistic numerical simulations, we demonstrate the robustness of our methodology to noise. In a second cohort of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
