How important are the residual nonadiabatic couplings for an accurate simulation of nonadiabatic quantum dynamics in a quasidiabatic representation?
Seonghoon Choi, Ji\v{r}\'i Van\'i\v{c}ek

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to evaluate the impact of residual nonadiabatic couplings in quasidiabatic quantum dynamics simulations, demonstrating that neglecting these couplings can lead to inaccurate results depending on the system and initial conditions.
Contribution
A general approach is proposed to assess the validity of neglecting residual nonadiabatic couplings in quasidiabatic simulations, using highly accurate numerical methods.
Findings
Neglecting residual couplings can cause incorrect dynamics in some systems.
Simulations with the exact quasidiabatic Hamiltonian are consistently accurate.
The method is demonstrated on Jahn--Teller and Renner--Teller models.
Abstract
Diabatization of the molecular Hamiltonian is a standard approach to removing the singularities of nonadiabatic couplings at conical intersections of adiabatic potential energy surfaces. In general, it is impossible to eliminate the nonadiabatic couplings entirely -- the resulting "quasidiabatic" states are still coupled by smaller but nonvanishing residual nonadiabatic couplings, which are typically neglected. Here, we propose a general method for assessing the validity of this potentially drastic approximation by comparing quantum dynamics simulated either with or without the residual couplings. To make the numerical errors negligible to the errors due to neglecting the residual couplings, we use the highly accurate and general eighth-order composition of the implicit midpoint method. The usefulness of the proposed method is demonstrated on nonadiabatic simulations in the cubic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
