Learning-Augmented Weighted Paging
Nikhil Bansal, Christian Coester, Ravi Kumar, Manish Purohit, Erik Vee

TL;DR
This paper introduces learning-augmented algorithms for weighted paging that leverage predictions to improve competitiveness, achieving tight bounds and smoothly degrading with prediction errors.
Contribution
It extends learning-augmented paging models to weighted settings, providing tight competitive bounds and handling imperfect predictions.
Findings
Deterministic algorithm is $$-competitive with perfect predictions.
Randomized algorithm is $O(( ext{log} \u00bb ext{ell}))$-competitive with perfect predictions.
Results generalize to interleaved paging and degrade gracefully with prediction errors.
Abstract
We consider a natural semi-online model for weighted paging, where at any time the algorithm is given predictions, possibly with errors, about the next arrival of each page. The model is inspired by Belady's classic optimal offline algorithm for unweighted paging, and extends the recently studied model for learning-augmented paging (Lykouris and Vassilvitskii, 2018) to the weighted setting. For the case of perfect predictions, we provide an -competitive deterministic and an -competitive randomized algorithm, where is the number of distinct weight classes. Both these bounds are tight, and imply an - and -competitive ratio, respectively, when the page weights lie between and . Previously, it was not known how to use these predictions in the weighted setting and only bounds of and were known, where is the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
