Performance of the Uniform Closure Method for open knotting as a Bayes-type classifier
Emily Tibor, Elizabeth M. Annoni, Erin Brine-Doyle, Nicole Kumerow,, Madeline Shogren, Jason Cantarella, Clayton Shonkwiler, and Eric J. Rawdon

TL;DR
This paper compares the performance of the Uniform Closure Method and the Bayes MAP classifier in classifying knots in open protein chains, finding them to be essentially equivalent in accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a classification perspective to knot detection in open chains and evaluates the performance of the Bayes MAP classifier against the standard Uniform Closure Method.
Findings
Both methods show comparable accuracy across various conditions.
The Bayes MAP classifier performs similarly to the Uniform Closure Method.
The study provides a new perspective on knot classification as a statistical problem.
Abstract
The discovery of knotting in proteins and other macromolecular chains has motivated researchers to more carefully consider how to identify and classify knots in open arcs. Most definitions classify knotting in open arcs by constructing an ensemble of closures and measuring the probability of different knot types among these closures. In this paper, we think of assigning knot types to open curves as a classification problem and compare the performance of the Bayes MAP classifier to the standard Uniform Closure Method. Surprisingly, we find that both methods are essentially equivalent as classifiers, having comparable accuracy and positive predictive value across a wide range of input arc lengths and knot types.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Biochemical and Structural Characterization · Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
