Probing Fairness of Mobile Ocular Biometrics Methods Across Gender on VISOB 2.0 Dataset
Anoop Krishnan, Ali Almadan, Ajita Rattani

TL;DR
This study investigates the fairness of ocular biometric methods for gender recognition and user authentication on mobile devices, finding comparable authentication performance across genders but disparities in gender classification accuracy.
Contribution
First to analyze fairness of ocular biometrics across gender, using VISOB 2.0 dataset, highlighting strengths in authentication and challenges in gender classification.
Findings
Comparable authentication performance for males and females.
Males outperform females in gender classification accuracy.
High AUC scores indicate effective authentication across genders.
Abstract
Recent research has questioned the fairness of face-based recognition and attribute classification methods (such as gender and race) for dark-skinned people and women. Ocular biometrics in the visible spectrum is an alternate solution over face biometrics, thanks to its accuracy, security, robustness against facial expression, and ease of use in mobile devices. With the recent COVID-19 crisis, ocular biometrics has a further advantage over face biometrics in the presence of a mask. However, fairness of ocular biometrics has not been studied till now. This first study aims to explore the fairness of ocular-based authentication and gender classification methods across males and females. To this aim, VISOB dataset, along with its gender annotations, is used for the fairness analysis of ocular biometrics methods based on ResNet-50, MobileNet-V2 and lightCNN-29 models. Experimental…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
