TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of presentation quality in academic publishing and offers a new perspective on how presentation influences journal tier, emphasizing the role of clarity and convincing communication.
Contribution
It introduces a novel angle on the impact of presentation quality on publication success, contrasting with existing advice focused on content and results.
Findings
Presentation quality affects journal tier
Clear communication improves acceptance chances
Different referees may value presentation differently
Abstract
Success in academia hinges on publishing in top tier journals. This requires innovative results. And this requires clear and convincing presentation of said results. Presentation can make the difference of one tier in journal level. A lot of useful advice on this topic is available online from well-respected outlets; see, for example, El-Omar (2014); Gould (2014); Neiles et al. (2015); Notz and Kafadar (2011); or Sachdeva (2020). This text provides a different angle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research