Melvin's "magnetic universe", the role of the magnetic tension and the implications for gravitational collapse
Christos G. Tsagas, Panagiotis Mavrogiannis

TL;DR
This paper investigates how magnetic fields, through their tension and elasticity, can oppose gravitational collapse in relativistic scenarios, suggesting magnetic tension may help stabilize collapsing massive objects.
Contribution
It demonstrates that magnetic tension can support against relativistic gravitational collapse, extending Melvin's idealized magnetic universe to realistic stellar collapse scenarios.
Findings
Magnetic fields tend to oppose gravitational implosion.
Magnetic tension increases as collapse progresses.
Magnetic fields do not self-gravitate but can support against collapse.
Abstract
Electromagnetism appears to have the potential to alter the fate of relativistic gravitational implosion. Coulomb forces, for example, can in principle prevent the ultimate collapse of charged matter to a singularity. Also, half a century ago, Mael Melvin noted that magnetic forcelines do not collapse under their own gravity, no matter how strong the latter may be. Instead, magnetic fields seemed capable of stabilising themselves against gravitational self-contraction. Intrigued, Melvin wondered whether magnetism could also support against the realistic collapse of charged matter. Here, we look back into these issues by means of two complementary scenarios. The first reconsiders Melvin's highly idealised "magnetic universe" and reaches the same conclusion, namely that magnetic fields do not self-gravitate. The second is a realistic collapse scenario, like that of magnetised massive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
