TL;DR
This review discusses methods for combining randomized trials and observational studies to improve causal inference, addressing issues of generalizability and confounding, with practical comparisons and implementations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of recent methods for integrating RCTs and observational data, including new implementations and simulation comparisons.
Findings
Methods improve generalizability of RCTs using observational data
Combining data reduces confounding effects in causal estimates
Simulation and real-world data demonstrate method effectiveness
Abstract
With increasing data availability, causal effects can be evaluated across different data sets, both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. RCTs isolate the effect of the treatment from that of unwanted (confounding) co-occurring effects but they may suffer from unrepresentativeness, and thus lack external validity. On the other hand, large observational samples are often more representative of the target population but can conflate confounding effects with the treatment of interest. In this paper, we review the growing literature on methods for causal inference on combined RCTs and observational studies, striving for the best of both worlds. We first discuss identification and estimation methods that improve generalizability of RCTs using the representativeness of observational data. Classical estimators include weighting, difference between conditional outcome…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
