How to choose which explanation to use with students? Discussing the tensiometer with beginning teachers
Laurence Viennot (MSC)

TL;DR
This study investigates how beginning physics teachers choose explanations for teaching, revealing complex decision-making processes involving criteria like consistency and simplicity, which impact teacher preparation.
Contribution
It provides insights into the decision-making criteria of student teachers when selecting explanations, highlighting the complexity and conflicting considerations involved.
Findings
Teachers value consistency but sometimes choose explanations that are inconsistent.
Conflicting ideas about simplicity and completeness influence explanation choices.
Interaction and critical analysis are crucial in teacher preparation.
Abstract
Among the many decisions to be made in their teaching practice, physics teachers must decide how to explain each particular phenomenon to students. This study explores student teachers' (STs) decision-making process when presented with several explanations of a physical phenomenon that might be used for teaching purposes. During individual interviews, seven STs were offered three different explanations of how a tensiometer works, all with an accurate conclusion. They were also supplied with a grid of criteria for critical analysis. Following in-depth critical analysis of the three explanations in close interaction with the interviewer, each ST was asked to specify the criteria for their choice of explanation, for themselves and for university students. Even after stressing that they valued consistency, some teachers opted for an explanation for students that they had just described as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
