A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learning
Nadia Burkart, Marco F. Huber

TL;DR
This survey reviews the principles, methodologies, and recent advances in explainable supervised machine learning, emphasizing the importance of transparency and interpretability in sensitive domains like healthcare and finance.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification of explainable SML approaches, clarifies key definitions, and discusses future research directions.
Findings
Classified existing explainability methods
Highlighted importance in sensitive domains
Presented an illustrative case study
Abstract
Predictions obtained by, e.g., artificial neural networks have a high accuracy but humans often perceive the models as black boxes. Insights about the decision making are mostly opaque for humans. Particularly understanding the decision making in highly sensitive areas such as healthcare or fifinance, is of paramount importance. The decision-making behind the black boxes requires it to be more transparent, accountable, and understandable for humans. This survey paper provides essential definitions, an overview of the different principles and methodologies of explainable Supervised Machine Learning (SML). We conduct a state-of-the-art survey that reviews past and recent explainable SML approaches and classifies them according to the introduced definitions. Finally, we illustrate principles by means of an explanatory case study and discuss important future directions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
