TL;DR
This paper benchmarks recent deep learning methods for real-time polyp detection, localization, and segmentation in colonoscopy images, highlighting ColonSegNet's superior speed and balanced accuracy on the Kvasir-SEG dataset.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive benchmarking of state-of-the-art methods, introducing ColonSegNet with improved speed and accuracy for clinical application.
Findings
ColonSegNet achieved an average precision of 0.8000.
It attained a mean IoU of 0.8100.
It is the fastest with 180 frames per second for detection and localization.
Abstract
Computer-aided detection, localisation, and segmentation methods can help improve colonoscopy procedures. Even though many methods have been built to tackle automatic detection and segmentation of polyps, benchmarking of state-of-the-art methods still remains an open problem. This is due to the increasing number of researched computer vision methods that can be applied to polyp datasets. Benchmarking of novel methods can provide a direction to the development of automated polyp detection and segmentation tasks. Furthermore, it ensures that the produced results in the community are reproducible and provide a fair comparison of developed methods. In this paper, we benchmark several recent state-of-the-art methods using Kvasir-SEG, an open-access dataset of colonoscopy images for polyp detection, localisation, and segmentation evaluating both method accuracy and speed. Whilst, most methods…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsGrid Sensitive · Global Average Pooling · Batch Normalization · Logistic Regression · Softmax · Residual Connection · BNB Customer Service Number +1-833-534-1729 · k-Means Clustering · Convolution · Average Pooling
