TL;DR
This paper explores methods for generating random stimuli to verify quantum circuits efficiently, demonstrating high error detection rates with minimal stimuli through theoretical analysis and extensive simulations.
Contribution
Introduces and analyzes three schemes for quantum stimuli generation, balancing error detection and efficiency, supported by theoretical and empirical validation.
Findings
High error detection rates achieved with few stimuli
Three schemes offer trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy
Approximately 10^6 simulations across 50,000 benchmarks conducted
Abstract
Verification of quantum circuits is essential for guaranteeing correctness of quantum algorithms and/or quantum descriptions across various levels of abstraction. In this work, we show that there are promising ways to check the correctness of quantum circuits using simulative verification and random stimuli. To this end, we investigate how to properly generate stimuli for efficiently checking the correctness of a quantum circuit. More precisely, we introduce, illustrate, and analyze three schemes for quantum stimuli generation---offering a trade-off between the error detection rate (as well as the required number of stimuli) and efficiency. In contrast to the verification in the classical realm, we show (both, theoretically and empirically) that even if only a few randomly-chosen stimuli (generated from the proposed schemes) are considered, high error detection rates can be achieved for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
