Branching Ratios for the Three Most Intense Gamma Rays in the Decay of $^{47}$Ca
E. Paige Abel (1, 2), Chloe Kleinfeldt (2), Colton Kalman (2),, Gregory W. Severin (1, 2) ((1) Department of Chemistry Michigan State, University, (2) National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory Michigan State, University)

TL;DR
This study precisely measured gamma-ray branching ratios in the decay of $^{47}$Ca, improving the accuracy of decay pathways and related beta decay branching ratios through experimental methods and verification techniques.
Contribution
The paper provides significantly more precise gamma-ray branching ratios for $^{47}$Ca decay, refining the understanding of its decay scheme and beta decay branching ratios.
Findings
Gamma-ray branching ratios for $^{47}$Ca decay are now known with greater precision.
The beta decay branching ratios of $^{47}$Ca to $^{47}$Sc states have been indirectly measured.
Half-lives of $^{47}$Ca and $^{47}$Sc were independently verified.
Abstract
A sample of Ca produced through isotope harvesting at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory was used to measure branching ratios of 7.17(5)%, 7.11(5)%, and 75.0(5)% for the 489.2, 807.9, and 1297.1 keV characteristic gamma-rays, respectively. Based on these updated branching ratios, the ground state to ground state Ca to Sc beta decay branching ratio has been indirectly measured as 17.7(5)% and the ground state to 1297.1 keV excited state as 82.2(5)%. These values represent a greatly increased precision for all five branching ratios compared to the currently accepted values. The measurements presented here were made relative to the ingrown Sc daughter in a Ca sample and the well-established 159.4 keV gamma-ray branching ratio and the half-life for the decay of Sc. These measurements were supported by verifying that the half-lives…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
