Why is the universe comprehensible?
Ian T. Durham

TL;DR
This paper explores why the universe is understandable by emphasizing the role of shared methodology and the universe's stability, which together enable humans to comprehend and utilize its regularities.
Contribution
It proposes that the universe's comprehensibility stems from mutual methodological agreement and stability, highlighting how comprehension constrains and shapes our understanding.
Findings
Comprehension relies on shared methodologies.
The universe's stability facilitates understanding.
Constraints of comprehension shape our knowledge.
Abstract
Why is the universe comprehensible? How is it that we can come to know its regularities well-enough to exploit them for our own gain? In this essay I argue that the nature of our comprehension lies in the mutually agreed upon methodology we use to attain it and on the basic stability of the universe. But I also argue that the very act of comprehension itself places constraints on what we can comprehend by forcing us to establish a context for our knowledge. In this way the universe has managed to conspire to make itself objectively comprehensible to subjective observers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
