Assessing congressional districting in Maine and New Hampshire
Sara Asgari, Quinn Basewitz, Ethan Bergmann, Jackson Brogsol,, Nathaniel Cox, Diana Davis, Martina Kampel, Becca Keating, Katie Knox, Angus, Lam, Jorge Lopez-Nava, Jennifer Paige, Nathan Pitock, Victoria Song, Dylan, Torrance

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the political geography of Maine and New Hampshire using voting data, revealing significant deviations in district boundaries likely caused by incumbent gerrymandering, and discusses limitations of fairness measures for two-district plans.
Contribution
It introduces a data-driven analysis of districting in Maine and New Hampshire, highlighting gerrymandering effects and limitations of classical fairness metrics.
Findings
District boundaries differ significantly from expected patterns.
Gerrymandering likely influences districting decisions.
Classical fairness measures have limitations for two-district plans.
Abstract
We use voting precinct and election data to analyze the political geography of New Hampshire and Maine. We find that the location of dividing line between Congressional districts in both states are significantly different than what we would expect, which we argue is likely due to incumbent gerrymandering. We also discuss the limitations of classical fairness measures for plans with only two districts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectoral Systems and Political Participation · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Judicial and Constitutional Studies
