Three noncontextual hidden variable models for the Peres-Mermin square
G\'abor Hofer-Szab\'o

TL;DR
This paper challenges the common interpretation of the Peres-Mermin square by constructing three hidden variable models that violate certain physical realization assumptions, suggesting noncontextual models may still be viable.
Contribution
It introduces three explicit hidden variable models for the Peres-Mermin square that violate standard physical realization assumptions, questioning the interpretation of contextuality.
Findings
Models demonstrate noncontextual hidden variables can exist under relaxed assumptions
Violations of physical realization conditions undermine the Peres-Mermin square's implications
Supports alternative interpretations of quantum contextuality
Abstract
I will argue that the Peres-Mermin square does not necessarily rule out a value-definite (deterministic) noncontextual hidden variable model if the operators are not given a physical interpretation satisfying the following two requirements: (i) each operator is uniquely realized by a single physical measurement; (ii) commuting operators are realized by simultaneous measurements. To underpin this claim, I will construct three hidden variable models for three different physical realizations of the Peres-Mermin square: one violating (i), another violating (ii), and a third one violating both (i) and (ii).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
