Evolution of dissipative and non-dissipative universes in holographic cosmological models with a power-law term
Nobuyoshi Komatsu

TL;DR
This paper compares dissipative and non-dissipative holographic cosmological models with a power-law term, analyzing density perturbations and thermodynamic constraints to determine which universe type aligns better with observations.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic study of first-order density perturbations in holographic models with a power-law term, highlighting the thermodynamic and observational viability of non-dissipative models.
Findings
The $ ext{Lambda}(t)$-$H^{ ext{alpha}}$ model aligns with observations for small $| ext{alpha}|$.
Thermodynamic constraints favor the non-dissipative $ ext{Lambda}(t)$-$H^{ ext{alpha}}$ model.
Dissipative BV-$H^{ ext{alpha}}$ models are less consistent with thermodynamics and observations.
Abstract
Density perturbations related to structure formations are expected to be different in dissipative and non-dissipative universes, even if the background evolution of the two universes is the same. To clarify the difference between the two universes, first-order density perturbations are studied, using two types of holographic cosmological models. The first type is a " model" similar to a time-varying cosmology for the non-dissipative universe. The second type is a "BV model" similar to a bulk viscous cosmology for the dissipative universe. To systematically examine the two different universes, a power-law term proportional to is applied to the and BV (bulk-viscous-cosmology-like) models, assuming a flat Friedmann--Robertson--Walker model for the late universe. Here, is the Hubble parameter and is a free parameter whose value…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
