Bottleneck Problems: Information and Estimation-Theoretic View
Shahab Asoodeh, Flavio Calmon

TL;DR
This paper unifies the theoretical understanding of information bottleneck and privacy funnel, introduces a broader class of bottleneck problems with alternative mutual information measures, and provides practical bounds and closed-form solutions for these complex optimization problems.
Contribution
It offers a unified theoretical framework for IB and PF, introduces generalized bottleneck problems with alternative mutual information, and develops methods for their tractable evaluation and closed-form solutions.
Findings
Proved a new cardinality bound for the auxiliary variable in IB.
Established connections between IB/PF and three information-theoretic coding problems.
Derived closed-form solutions for several bottleneck problems in the binary case.
Abstract
Information bottleneck (IB) and privacy funnel (PF) are two closely related optimization problems which have found applications in machine learning, design of privacy algorithms, capacity problems (e.g., Mrs. Gerber's Lemma), strong data processing inequalities, among others. In this work, we first investigate the functional properties of IB and PF through a unified theoretical framework. We then connect them to three information-theoretic coding problems, namely hypothesis testing against independence, noisy source coding and dependence dilution. Leveraging these connections, we prove a new cardinality bound for the auxiliary variable in IB, making its computation more tractable for discrete random variables. In the second part, we introduce a general family of optimization problems, termed as \textit{bottleneck problems}, by replacing mutual information in IB and PF with other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
