Low-lying single-particle structure of 17C and the N = 14 sub-shell closure
X. Pereira-L\'opez, B. Fern\'andez-Dom\'inguez, F. Delaunay, N.L., Achouri, N.A. Orr, W.N. Catford, M. Assi\'e, S. Bailey, B. Bastin, Y., Blumenfeld, R. Borcea, M. Caama\~no, L. Caceres, E. Cl\'ement, A. Corsi, N., Curtis, Q. Deshayes, F. Farget, M. Fisichella, G. de France

TL;DR
This study investigates the single-particle structure of 17C, revealing the absence of the N=14 sub-shell closure and identifying a potential one-neutron halo state through transfer reaction experiments and theoretical comparisons.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental analysis of 17C's single-particle states, confirming shell model predictions and challenging the existence of the N=14 sub-shell closure.
Findings
Confirmed spin-parity assignments for excited states
Provided evidence against N=14 sub-shell closure
Identified a potential one-neutron halo state
Abstract
The first investigation of the single-particle structure of the bound states of 17C, via the d(16C, p) transfer reaction, has been undertaken. The measured angular distributions confirm the spin-parity assignments of 1/2+ and 5/2+ for the excited states located at 217 and 335 keV, respectively. The spectroscopic factors deduced for these states exhibit a marked single-particle character, in agreement with shell model and particle-core model calculations, and combined with their near degeneracy in energy provide clear evidence for the absence of the N = 14 sub-shell closure. The very small spectroscopic factor found for the 3/2+ ground state is consistent with theoretical predictions and indicates that the {\nu}1d3/2 strength is carried by unbound states. With a dominant l = 0 valence neutron configuration and a very low separation energy, the 1/2+ excited state is a one-neutron halo…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
