Modeling in-ice radio propagation with parabolic equation methods
S. Prohira, C. Sbrocco, P. Allison, J. Beatty, D. Besson, A. Connolly,, P. Dasgupta, C. Deaconu, K.D. de Vries, S. De Kockere, D. Frikken, C. Hast,, E. Huesca Santiago, C.-Y. Kuo, U.A. Latif, V. Lukic, T. Meures, K. Mulrey, J., Nam, A. Nozdrina, J.P. Ralston, R.S. Stanley

TL;DR
This paper explores parabolic equation methods for modeling radio-wave propagation in polar ice, offering a computationally efficient alternative to full-field solutions and more detailed than geometric ray-tracing, with implications for neutrino detection experiments.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new PE approximation tailored for in-ice radio propagation, highlighting its advantages over existing methods and discussing its impact on neutrino detection sensitivity.
Findings
PE methods are more flexible than RT and more efficient than FDTD.
Current RT methods may overestimate detector sensitivity.
PE methods could improve modeling accuracy for in-ice radio detection.
Abstract
We investigate the use of parabolic equation (PE) methods for solving radio-wave propagation in polar ice. PE methods provide an approximate solution to Maxwell's equations, in contrast to full-field solutions such as finite-difference-time-domain (FDTD) methods, yet provide a more complete model of propagation than simple geometric ray-tracing (RT) methods that are the current state of the art for simulating in-ice radio detection of neutrino-induced cascades. PE are more computationally efficient than FDTD methods, and more flexible than RT methods, allowing for the inclusion of diffractive effects, and modeling of propagation in regions that cannot be modeled with geometric methods. We present a new PE approximation suited to the in-ice case. We conclude that current ray-tracing methods may be too simplistic in their treatment of ice properties, and their continued use could…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
