Flavor-dependent radiative corrections in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering
Oleksandr Tomalak, Pedro Machado, Vishvas Pandey, Ryan Plestid

TL;DR
This paper provides precise calculations of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross sections on spin-0 nuclei within the Standard Model, accounting for flavor-dependent radiative corrections and uncertainties, with implications for fundamental physics tests and reactor monitoring.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive calculation of neutrino-nucleus scattering cross sections including flavor-dependent radiative effects and detailed uncertainty analysis.
Findings
Radiative corrections break flavor universality due to lepton mass effects.
Predicted cross sections achieve subpercent precision at low energies.
Results are applicable to Standard Model tests, new physics searches, and reactor monitoring.
Abstract
We calculate coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross sections on spin-0 nuclei (e.g. Ar and Si) at energies below 100 MeV within the Standard Model and account for all effects of permille size. We provide a complete error budget including uncertainties at nuclear, nucleon, hadronic, and quark levels separately as well as perturbative error. Our calculation starts from the four-fermion effective field theory to explicitly separate heavy-particle mediated corrections (which are absorbed by Wilson coefficients) from light-particle contributions. Electrons and muons running in loops introduce a nontrivial dependence on the momentum transfer due to their relatively light masses. These same loops, and those mediated by tau leptons, break the flavor universality because of mass-dependent electromagnetic radiative corrections. Nuclear physics uncertainties significantly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
