TL;DR
This paper introduces the Strongish Planted Clique Hypothesis (SPCH), a new computational hardness assumption, and demonstrates its implications for inapproximability results and graph pattern detection problems, establishing tighter lower bounds.
Contribution
The paper formulates the SPCH, a novel hardness assumption, and applies it to derive nearly tight inapproximability and lower bounds for various graph problems.
Findings
SPCH implies no polynomial time algorithm can approximate Densest k-Subgraph within o(k).
SPCH leads to tighter lower bounds for graph pattern detection problems.
The results improve upon previous bounds based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis.
Abstract
We formulate a new hardness assumption, the Strongish Planted Clique Hypothesis (SPCH), which postulates that any algorithm for planted clique must run in time (so that the state-of-the-art running time of is optimal up to a constant in the exponent). We provide two sets of applications of the new hypothesis. First, we show that SPCH implies (nearly) tight inapproximability results for the following well-studied problems in terms of the parameter : Densest -Subgraph, Smallest -Edge Subgraph, Densest -Subhypergraph, Steiner -Forest, and Directed Steiner Network with terminal pairs. For example, we show, under SPCH, that no polynomial time algorithm achieves -approximation for Densest -Subgraph. This inapproximability ratio improves upon the previous best factor from (Chalermsook et al., FOCS 2017).…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
The Strongish Planted Clique Hypothesis and Its Consequences· youtube
