Lamotrigine Therapy for Bipolar Depression: Analysis of Self-Reported Patient Data
Antoine Nzeyimana, Kate EA Saunders, John R Geddes, Patrick E McSharry

TL;DR
This study reanalyzed data from a clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of lamotrigine in treating bipolar depression, finding it reduces symptoms but requires at least 44 weeks for consistent results.
Contribution
It provides an unbiased classification analysis of lamotrigine efficacy and identifies the time frame for statistically significant outcomes in bipolar depression treatment.
Findings
Lamotrigine plus Quetiapine decreased depressive symptoms.
Significant effects observed after 44 weeks of treatment.
Classification accuracy of 62% for predicting treatment response.
Abstract
Background: Depression in people with bipolar disorder is a major cause of long-term disability, possibly leading to early mortality and currently, limited safe and effective therapies exist. A double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial (CEQUEL study) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Lamotrigine plus Quetiapine versus Quetiapine monotherapy in patients with bipolar type I or type II disorders. Objective: The objective of our study was to reanalyze CEQUEL data and determine an unbiased classification accuracy for active lamotrigine versus placebo. We also wanted to establish the time it took for the drug to provide statistically significant outcomes. Methods: Between October 21, 2008 and April 27, 2012, 202 participants from 27 sites in United Kingdom were randomly assigned to two treatments; 101: lamotrigine, 101: placebo. The primary variable used for estimating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
