How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research?
Xavier Franch, Daniel Mendez, Andreas Vogelsang, Rogardt, Heldal, Eric Knauss, Marc Oriol, Guilherme H. Travassos, Jeffrey, C. Carver, Thomas Zimmermann

TL;DR
This study surveys industry practitioners to assess their perception of RE research relevance, revealing generally positive views but highlighting factors influencing perception and areas for future focus.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on practitioners' perceptions of RE research relevance and identifies key factors affecting these perceptions.
Findings
Practitioners view most RE research as relevant or worthwhile.
Links to industry and research methods influence perception.
Suggestions include focusing on longstanding topics like elicitation.
Abstract
The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is vital for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. Some authors have speculated about a mismatch between research and practice in the RE discipline. However, there is not much evidence to support or refute this perception. This paper presents the results of a study aimed at gathering evidence from practitioners about their perception of the relevance of RE research and at understanding the factors that influence that perception. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey of industry practitioners with expertise in RE. The participants rated the perceived relevance of 435 scientific papers presented at five top RE-related conferences. The 153 participants provided a total of 2,164 ratings. The practitioners rated RE research as essential or worthwhile in a majority of cases. However, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
