Statistical evaluation of in-vivo bioassays in regulatory toxicology considering males and females
Ludwig A. Hothorn

TL;DR
This paper proposes a joint statistical test for in-vivo bioassays that considers sex differences in toxicology, improving upon traditional separate evaluations for males and females.
Contribution
It introduces a novel joint testing approach for sex-specific and pooled comparisons, addressing issues with existing pre-tests for sex-by-treatment interactions.
Findings
Demonstrates the joint test using real data example.
Shows improved statistical inference for sex differences in bioassays.
Provides R code implementation with multcomp package.
Abstract
The separate evaluation for males and females is the recent standard in in-vivo toxicology for dose or treatment effects using Dunnett tests. The alternative pre-test for sex-by-treatment interaction is problematic. Here a joint test is proposed considering the two sex-specific and the pooled Dunnett-type comparisons. The calculation of either simultaneous confidence intervals or adjusted p-values with the R-package multcomp is demonstrated using a real data example.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
