Continuum model of the simple dielectric fluid: Consistency between density based and continuum mechanics methods

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates the consistency between density functional and continuum mechanics approaches in modeling simple dielectric fluids, providing a rigorous derivation of the pressure tensor and force balance equations.

Contribution

It establishes the equivalence of density-based and continuum mechanics methods for dielectric fluids and derives a well-defined pressure tensor from deformation energy.

Findings

Continuum mechanics approach yields a consistent force balance equation.

Pressure tensor derived from deformation energy resolves previous ambiguities.

Both methods are shown to be compatible in modeling dielectric fluids.

Abstract

The basic continuum model for polar fluids is deceptively simple. The free energy integral consists of four terms: The coupling of polarization to an external field, the electrostatic energy of the induced electric field interacting with itself and the stored polarization energy quadratic in the polarization. A local function of density accounts for the mechanical state of the fluid. Viewed as a non-equilibrium free energy functional of number density and polarization, minimization in these two densities under constraints of the Maxwell field equations should lead the correct equilibrium state. The alternative is a continuum mechanics approach in which the mechanical degree of freedom is extended to full deformation. We show that the continuum electromechanics method leads to a force balance equation which is consistent with the density functional equilibrium equation. The continuum mechanics procedure is significantly more demanding. The gain is a well defined pressure tensor derived from deformation of total energy. This resolves the issue of the uncertainty in the pressure tensor obtained from integration of the force density, which is the conventional method in density based thermomechanics. Our derivation is based on the variational electrostatics approach developed by Ericksen (Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. {\bf 183} 299 (2007)).